LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 2004)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 22 Dec 2004 21:39:53 -0500
Reply-To:     Jeffrey Miller <millerjeffm@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Jeffrey Miller <millerjeffm@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:      scores in principal components analysis
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

Hi all,

I have a question regarding calculation of unrotated and rotated scores in principal components analysis

Ok, if no components are discarded then all information has been preserved. Then the score for a subject on a component is the sum of (product of the weight from the eigenvector and subject's standardized score on the original variable). So, score on pc1 = w1*z1 + w2*z2 + ... + wp*zp. If components are discarded, we can still get a score on those components but it wouldn't be meaningful to do so.

Now, here's where I'm getting confused. If we rotate the retained components, the score for the first rotated component is the sum of the products of the standardized component scores and the appropriate element of the transformation matrix. So, if we have to use scores on all retained components to get a rotated component score, then it can't be accurate since information has been lost through discarding components. The only way I can see it working is if the rotated component score is based on ALL components. But, this seem uninteresting since the point of PCA is data reduction. So, is the rotated component score for a subject just considered an approximation?

Thanks in advance,

Jeff Miller


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page