| Date: | Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:40:22 -0500 |
|---|
| Reply-To: | Mike Rhoads <RHOADSM1@WESTAT.COM> |
|---|
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
|---|
| From: | Mike Rhoads <RHOADSM1@WESTAT.COM> |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: just some list etiquette |
|---|
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
|---|
Perhaps one or more of us should add to his/her standard sig something like
the following:
For information on getting the most out of SAS-L, see Howard Schreier's SUGI
28 paper at http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi28/248-28.pdf.
Mike Rhoads
Westat
RhoadsM1@Westat.com
-----Original Message-----
From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Choate,
Paul@DDS
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 2:09 PM
To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: just some list etiquette
The real problem is with poor posts. How about examples, code, logs,
platform, version, etc. ???
Paul Choate
DDS Data Extraction
(916) 654-2160
-----Original Message-----
From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of David
L. Cassell
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 10:56 AM
To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: just some list etiquette
Jim Groeneveld <jim1stat@YAHOO.CO.UK> wrote:
> Reading several postings lately from people with some kind of
> unidentifiable names, like just some initials or nicknames, made me
think
etc.
| 
