LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2005)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:32:08 -0500
Reply-To:   Andrew Walsh <awalsh@uhnresearch.ca>
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Andrew Walsh <awalsh@uhnresearch.ca>
Subject:   multiple regression: interaction
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

hello, i would like to pose a question regarding interactions in multiple regression for which i would appreciate some advice. i have a hypothesized model where: (1) physical symptom distress, (2) perceived social support, and (3) anxiety interact to influence levels of depression(DV) (a 3-way interaction). so my question is: is it appropriate to jump right to the 3-way interaction without examining the 2-way interactions? i ask this for 2 reasons. first, when i enter the three 2-way interactions into my model along with the 3-way interaction, two of the 2-way interactions are significant (perceived social support x anxiety is not significant) and the 3-way interaction is not significant. however, the 3-way interaction is significant when it is in the model without the three 2-way interactions.

thanks for any and all advice!


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page