LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2005)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:49:48 -0200
Reply-To:   Marcos Sanches <marcos.sanches@IPSOS.COM.BR>
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Marcos Sanches <marcos.sanches@IPSOS.COM.BR>
Subject:   Problem with factor analysis
In-Reply-To:   <200502022117.j12LHa79005341@listserv.cc.uga.edu>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Hi all,

I am performing a factor analysis with 60 attributes. Each one were rated in a importance scale - 0 for Not Important to 10 for Very Important. As there are so many attributes each respondent rated only a random subset of 39 attributes. That means I have 60 - 39 = 21 missing values for each case. I want to run a factor analysis with this data.

If I select the listwise method of missing values deletion, of course I end up with no case left.

If I select the pairwise method of missing values deletion, I get na error message - "The matrix is not positive definite. This may be due to pairwise deletion of missing values.".

If I select the "replace with means" method of missing values substitution, then it sorks well.

My questions are:

1) Why does the pairwise method does not work? Even when I select a subsample it does not work. I know what is a 'not positive definete matrix', but why this happens? Is there a way to handle this?

Before the enterview had been done, I made a simulation using another study. I deleted randomly some values for every case so that every cases had some missing values, then I ran a factor analysis with pairwise deletion. It worked pretty well, in fact the final factor were almost the same these one got with the complete data. So I didn't hope this problem could happen.

2) In such a case, would the factor analysis done with missing values replaced with means be reliable?

Thanks in advance,

Marcos


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page