LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2005)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:54:20 +1100
Reply-To:     Patrick Flanagan <>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Patrick Flanagan <>
Subject:      Re: simple effects in GLM
Comments: To: "Parise, Carol A." <>
In-Reply-To:  <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

Carol, What you want to do is available through Syntax. e.g. add the compare and adj keywords to the commands generated in the GUI and pasted into a syntax window: /EMMEANS = TABLES(group*time) compare(group) adj(bonf) This will compare the groups at each of the three times. Using a bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons. Other possible adjustments are Sidak and none.

here's the full syntax file: GLM time3 time2 time1 BY group /WSFACTOR = time 3 /METHOD = SSTYPE(3) /EMMEANS = TABLES(group) /EMMEANS = TABLES(time) /EMMEANS = TABLES(group*time) compare (group) adjust(bonferroni) /PRINT = DESCRIPTIVE /CRITERIA = ALPHA(.05) /WSDESIGN = time /DESIGN = group .

cheers, Patrick

At 6:03 PM -0800 16/2/05, Parise, Carol A. wrote: >Hi all, > >I've run a mixed design anova using GLM. I have one repeated factor >(time-3 levels) and one between subjects factor (group-2 levels). I >have a statistically significant time x group interaction. Now, i >want to know at what levels of time are the 2 groups different. I >recall that when i ran MANOVA, i would have done something like this: > >/design = time1 within group > >/design=time2 within group > >/design=time3 within group > >and the result would be anova tables for each of these tests. a >statistically significant F would mean that the 2 groups were >different at the given time. > >i cannot seem to accomplish this in GLM. the error seems simply to >be syntax. anyone know the correct way to tell spss to do this? > >thanks for your always valuable insights. > >carol > >sacramento, ca

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page