|
Kevin Roland Viel a écrit :
>>Fran�ois a �crit :
>
>
>>Sorry, it's a bit OT but 53 weeks, for 2004 for instance, is just the
>>ISO way of numbering weeks.
>
>
> This is not OT. Perhaps next time, you might elaborate on what ISO is,
> saving some of us a net search...
>
> Regards to the whole wide world :)
>
> Kevin
>
Hi,
Thanks for the whole wide world ...
Can i find a better reference than
http://www.sconsig.com/sastips/tip00063.htm
Cheers,
|