LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2005)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:39:05 +0100
Reply-To:     Marta García-Granero
              <biostatistics@terra.es>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Marta García-Granero
              <biostatistics@terra.es>
Organization: Asesoría Bioestadística
Subject:      Re: GLM TEST subcommand - specify error term
In-Reply-To:  <000001c528de$d3c85720$6400a8c0@s0023636763>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Fritz,

Perhaps you could try MANOVA (not available trhu the GUI anymore). The following subcommand is allowed:

/DESIGN= term VS RESIDUAL

HTH

Marta

FC> Thank-you for your quick response. If I had only a few dependent FC> variables, I could do as you recommended and repeat the analysis and FC> specify the df and MSE in the /TEST subcommand to get the test that I FC> want. However, the program is going to be used in situations where FC> there are 20-30 dependent variables and the user would like to automate FC> the process so that the program would be run once and the output would FC> be sent to a file for post-processing into a table.

FC> Is anyone familiar with a way that the MS(Error) can be specified as the FC> error term on a /TEST subcommand within GLM without having to run the FC> analysis twice and 'manually' entering the df and value for the FC> MS(Error)?


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page