LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2005)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:01:52 -0700
Reply-To:     William Dudley <william.dudley@nurs.utah.edu>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         William Dudley <william.dudley@nurs.utah.edu>
Subject:      Combining measures
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

I am working on a project in which we have used the CESD as a measure of depression. For a variety of reasons the investigators are thinking of switching to the depression scale of the Profile of Mood States (POMS). In previous work with the population in which we used both the POMS and the CESD we found that the CESD had slightly better psychometric properties and was slightly more sensitive to the intervention than the POMS. However the CESD is leading to some unforseen administrative problems and we are considering using the POMS. This will, of course, lead to problems as we try to analyze outcomes down the road. I anticipate that we could convert the CESD and POMS to standard scores and combine them, but I'd rather not.

I wonder if others out there have faced similar problems and have had success melding two different measures and treating them as the same indicator following a similar shift in data collection .

Thanks

Bill

**********************************************************************

William N. Dudley, PhD Emma Eccels Jones Nursing Research Center

University of Utah

College of Nursing

10 South 2000 East

Salt Lake City, UT 84122-5880

http://www.nurs.utah.edu/faculty/william_dudley.htm

**********************************************************************


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page