Date:         Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:06:25 -0400
Reply-To:     "Howard Schreier <hs AT dc-sug DOT org>" <nospam@HOWLES.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Howard Schreier <hs AT dc-sug DOT org>" <nospam@HOWLES.COM>
Subject:      Re: proc tabulate vs proc means

They do overlap in capability.

I tend to use MEANS/SUMMARY to produce intermediate results (data sets
intended for subsequent processing) and TABULATE for reporting.

On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:58:24 -0700, David Fickbohm <davefickbohm@YAHOO.COM>
wrote:

>People,
>Am I correct in saying that proc tabulate is used to produce a similar
output as proc means?
>Assuming that is true then I would not run proc means then proc tabulate.
I would run proc tabulate instead of proc means.
>
>Sorry for the stupid question
>Dave
>
>
>Dave Fickbohm
>Use Technology to the Fullest
>1250 45th st suite 200
>Emeryville, CA, 94608
>510 594 4151 voice
>
>---------------------------------
>Discover Yahoo!
> Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news & more. Check it out!