LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2005, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:35:57 +0200
Reply-To:     Pierre Gaudebout <pierre.gaudebout@gmail.com>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Pierre Gaudebout <pierre.gaudebout@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: comparison with weighted percentages (complement)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

Some elements concerning the sampling design. The last 150 patients discharged from hospital as from one D-day (transverse survey) are questioned on their stay. Twenty five hospitals are concerned with the investigation but they do not form a homogeneous group in term of capacity (there is approximately a ratio from 1 to 25 between smallest and the largest hospital as regards the number of annual admissions).

It would be too expensive to carry out this investigation with stratified samples with proportional allocation. We have to choose samples with equal allocation but with "rectification" by giving a different weight to hospitals (this weight is calculated like the ratio between the number of annual admissions of the hospital and that of the whole of the studied hospitals).

Concerning the choice to modify the coefficients for the test, it is simply a question of redefining the weight of each hospital of the group (H2, H3, H4 and H5, to take again the example).

Personally I am not convinced perfectly of the utility to balance but in fact the choice was endorsed by statisticians more senior than me.

In all the cases thank you to David Cassell for your valuable comments

Best regards

Pierre Gaudebout


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page