LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2005, week 5)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:39:35 -0700
Reply-To:     "Terjeson, Mark (IM&R)" <Mterjeson@RUSSELL.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Terjeson, Mark (IM&R)" <Mterjeson@RUSSELL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Best practice: check for blank macro parameters
Comments: To: m n <iced_phoenix_news@YAHOO.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Hi Matt,

Very well written question. Without answering directly but possibly indirectly, the first thing that comes to mind is the interesting aspect that may/maynot come out of this, which I am wondering how many people first use your first syntax, and then as subtle data content inaccuracies creep into the picture that people apply the varying degrees of necessity in the exact same order that you have listed them. It seems that it may not be that we incur greater "degrees" of undesired result but probably more that we incur certain levels of need on a less frequent basis. e.g. 92% &VAR= %then 5% "&VAR"="" 2% &VAR=%str() 1% %superq(),%nrstr,%bquote,%nrbquote

It's not that these percentages are accurate, because enviroments will differ, but it was just a curiosity of mine in seeing the "pattern of use" (or the driven need) since it is not so much a question of which is right or wrong, or better or worse, because we can already assume just as any other language command or function that each is black and white and already has its set of characteristics and behaviors dependent upon the data content being processed.

Hope this is helpful.

Mark Terjeson Senior Programmer Analyst, IM&R Russell Investment Group

Russell Global Leaders in Multi-Manager Investing

-----Original Message----- From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of m n Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:00 AM To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Best practice: check for blank macro parameters

Dear SAS-L,

For the common practice of checking that required macro parameters are not blank, different programmers adopt different approaches:

* %if &VAR= %then <insert code> * %if "&VAR"="" %then <insert code> * %if &VAR=%str() %then <insert code> * using %superq(), %nrstr, %bquote, %nrbquote, etc in various ways.

Etc, etc.

Is there any consensus among the gurus as to a Best Practice in this regard (i.e. a method that is quite likely to work regardless of what users may pass into the macro)?

Thanks in advance, Matt

____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page