Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:25:07 -0300
Reply-To: Hector Maletta <hmaletta@fibertel.com.ar>
Sender: "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: Hector Maletta <hmaletta@fibertel.com.ar>
Subject: Re: Cluster Analysis - best practices
In-Reply-To: <CD78388FAE6FCA4DA5A345BC93CA1C6D34C7F2@ex0.asurite.ad.asu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
A good introduction is Brian Everitt, Cluster Analysis (Arnold, London and
Halsted Press, New York).
At a higher level of sophistication, K.Jajuga, A. Sokolowski and H.-H. Bock,
editors, Classification, Clustering and Data Analysis (Springer).
About using SPSS clustering procedures, you better follow Marija Norusis'
advice.
Hector
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Aric Zion
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 8:21 PM
> To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Cluster Analysis - best practices
>
> A clear overview is provided by H. Charles Romesburg's
> "Cluster Analysis for Researchers", (2004) Lulu Press. While
> this doesn't give guidance on how to specifically run Cluster
> Analysis in SPSS, it does offer an very clear view of how
> cluster analysis operates.
>
> Aric
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SPSSX(r) Discussion on behalf of Bob Schacht
> Sent: Mon 9/26/2005 1:22 PM
> To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Cluster Analysis - best practices
>
>
>
> At 04:32 AM 9/26/2005, cristiano wrote:
> >Dear listers,
> > I'm a statistician but I'm looking for some
> books/resources/example for
> >using Cluster Analysis with SPSS: i'd like to know
> the models and methods
> >behind this analysis.
> > In your experience, could you suggest to me some stuff?
> > Thanks in advance
> > Cristiano
>
> Cristiano,
> As a prelude to your reading, let me comment in
> general. Cluster analyses
> fall into two approaches: One is polythetic
> agglomerative in nature, the
> other monothetic subdivisive.
>
> Polythetic agglomerative methods start with every
> case as an individual,
> and proceed to cluster by combining cases that most
> closely resemble each
> other. In each step of the analysis, the similarity
> between remaining cases
> and clusters is measured, and those most closely
> resembling each other are
> combined. This proceeds by steps as far as one wants
> to go, based on
> measures of cohesion or similarity.
>
> Monothetic subdivisive methods, on the other hand,
> start with all cases
> combined into one supergroup. The procedure in this
> case is how to
> subdivide the supergroup in to two groups in a way
> that maximizes the
> *difference* between the two groups. I'm not clear on
> how this procedure
> works, but it may begin with variables with the
> highest degree of
> variability, and splitting the cases at the mean.
> Again, the process
> proceeds stepwise until some threshold criterion is reached.
>
> You may have some a priori reason for preferring one
> approach over the
> other. Descriptions of the methods may not identify
> themselves clearly with
> these alternatives, so this overview might prove helpful.
>
> Bob
>
>
> Robert M. Schacht, Ph.D. <schacht@hawaii.edu>
> Pacific Basin Rehabilitation Research & Training Center
> 1268 Young Street, Suite #204
> Research Center, University of Hawaii
> Honolulu, HI 96814
>
>
> __________ Informacin de NOD32 1.1233 (20050926) __________
>
> Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 Antivirus System
> http://www.nod32.com
>
>
|