LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2005)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 7 Sep 2005 19:29:44 +0100
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Keith Starborn <>
Subject:      Re: Collinearity Statistics
Comments: To: Omar Farook <>
In-Reply-To:  <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed"

Keith Starborn

Dear Omar,

Many investigators will exclude a predictor variable for reasons of multicollinearity if the VIF is greater than or equal to 4 (likewise if the tolerance is lesser than or equal to .25). Your tolerances and VIFs look good. Even so, you might want to consider looking at the bivariate correlations between the predictor that has a VIF of 2.3 and the other predictors. I might be a little concerned that this predictor and one other predictor are highly related, leading to potential supression effects when both are entered into a multiple regression. There might be no problem, and if there is, then perhaps the two predictors could be entered as a composite.



Quoting Omar Farook <>:

> Dear Friends. > > > > I have a multiple regression model consist of 7 independent variables. > > the tolerance figures between 0.435 & 0.806 & the VIF six values > between 1.241 & 1.956 & one is 2.300. > > are there any evidence from the figures above that the model > suffering from multicollinearity problem? > > I will be very appreciate if you support your answers with some references. > > thanks in advance > > > > Omar. > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. >

-- For personalized and experienced statistical consulting, visit

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page