LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2005)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:29:03 -0700
Reply-To:     Dale Glaser <glaserconsult@sbcglobal.net>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Dale Glaser <glaserconsult@sbcglobal.net>
Subject:      Time Series inquiry.......
In-Reply-To:  <200510180708.j9I78nGP001491@listserv.cc.uga.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Hi all.....I will be working on a project whereby there are 99 matches (i.e., 198 participants in the study) with approximately one dozen variables measured on a varying basis over a varying number of days. For example from one matched pair one individual from the experimental group is measured on one variable (e.g., respiratory rate) 8 times on day 1, then 9 times on day 2, and then 4 times on day 6; their matched cohort (control group) may be in the study for five days and have a very different number of measures per day. Also, the time by which they were measured was not standardized (i.e., not all were measured at 8 am, 9 am, etc.). There can be from 10 to 80 measures per person on a given variable given the length of their participation. I was envisioning a multi-sample latent growth curve approach until I found out the # of measures (note: the client would indeed like to model ALL the measures as opposed to collapsing across time/days). Subsequently, a time series approach was proposed (e.g., ARIMA) though I am having difficulty how to best pool the 198 particpants given the varying rates of measures across a varying rate of days.

If anyone has had experience with such a design, I would be most appreciative if you would be wiling to shed insight about the optimal way to handle such a time-unstructured design. I have pondered a mixed-model approach or pooled time series, but the number of measures across time see to prohibit a mixed-model approach (I do have HLM6.0 and Mplus) and I"m not sure if pooled time series is appropriate (i.e, does each column represent an individual's 10- 80 or so measures, and are they collapsed?).

Again, thank you for your time...Dale Glaser

Dale Glaser, Ph.D. Principal--Glaser Consulting Lecturer--SDSU/USD/AIU 4003 Goldfinch St, Suite G San Diego, CA 92103 phone: 619-220-0602 fax: 619-220-0412 email: glaserconsult@sbcglobal.net website: www.glaserconsult.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page