LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2006)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:02:59 -0500
Reply-To:     Art@DrKendall.org
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Art Kendall <Art@DrKendall.org>
Organization: Social Research Consultants
Subject:      Re: Paired t-test versus repeated measures NOVA
Comments: To: Bob Green <bgreen@dyson.brisnet.org.au>
In-Reply-To:  <5.1.0.14.0.20060227222610.00be5180@pop3.brisnet.org.au>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

the square of a paired t-test is the F from a oneway repeated measures ANOVA with 2 levels. t**2 = F with one df in the numerator.

Art Art@DrKendall.org Social Research Consultants

Bob Green wrote:

> Without a lot of luck I have been looking for literature that > discusses the > indications for the use of a paired (dependent t-test) versus a Repeated > Measures ANOVA. > > Texts such as Tabachnick and Fidell cover Repeated measures > (within-subject) analyses in detail, but is silent on the pared > t-test. Any > suggesyions on discussions of the respective applications or > advantages/disadvantages is appreciated, > > > Bob Green > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page