LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (March 2006, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 24 Mar 2006 07:25:48 -0500
Reply-To:     Jim Groeneveld <jim2stat@YAHOO.CO.UK>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Jim Groeneveld <jim2stat@YAHOO.CO.UK>
Subject:      SAS viewer v9 not fully compatible

Hi friends,

While the SAS viewers of the different SAS versions do not use user specified formats for presentation, they allow datasets to be shown with either unformatted values or formatted values, where those formats only apply to internal SAS formats, not user defined formats. It just ignores the stored references to associated user defined formats.

Since SAS vs. 9 (which subversion???) its docs clearly indicate that the maximum length of the format names has increased: - from 8 to 32 for a numeric format - from 7 to 31 for a numeric informat - from 7 to 31 for a character format - from 6 to 30 for a character informat Could anyone of you indicate which subversion of 9 was the first one to allow for langer format names?

And indeed SAS vs. 9.1.3 allows to process my numeric format with a name of 9 characters. And so does Enterprise Guide vs. 3.0{.2.414}. But the SAS viewer vs. 9.130.0.30 aborts on that format with an "Unknown error"; it refuses to load the dataset. The SAS viewer vs. 8.2.1.0 shows the same error message, while it displays other SAS9 datasets correctly.

So, in order to be able to use the SAS viewer for quick dataset display, also in cases where there is no other SAS software, one has to stick to the previous limited user format names. I know one should never look a gift horse in the mouth and half a loaf is better than none, but one should reckon with this limitation. Gradually I am wondering what the extra value of the SAS9 viewer is over the SAS8 one, except for a smaller installation package.

Regards - Jim. -- Jim Groeneveld, Netherlands Statistician, SAS consultant home.hccnet.nl/jim.groeneveld

P.S. Could anyone of you indicate which subversion of 9 was the first one to allow for langer format names?

P.P.S. For those of you going to SUGI tomorrow: have a very nice time meeting each other. I wished I would be there, but I can't. Enjoy it!


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page