Date:         Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:05:29 -0500
Reply-To:     "Droogendyk, Harry" <harry.droogendyk@RBC.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Droogendyk, Harry" <harry.droogendyk@RBC.COM>
Subject:      Re: requesting suggestions for a coder's corner paper
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso8859-1"

The Bruns / Pass SUGI battles come to mind....

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sas-l@listserv.uga.edu [mailto:owner-sas-l@listserv.uga.edu]
On Behalf Of Jack Hamilton
Sent: 2006, March, 16 7:00 PM
To: Chang Chung
Cc: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SAS-L] requesting suggestions for a coder's corner paper

on 3/14/2006 1:00 PM Chang Chung said the following:

[urban legends]

> "proc tabulate (or report) is more powerful than proc report (or
tabulate)"


I think I would claim that PROC REPORT is more powerful than PROC
TABULATE, because you can use data-step-ish code in PROC REPORT, but not
in PROC TABULATE.

I wouldn't care to argue that PROC REPORT without data step-ish code is
more powerful.
_______________________________________________________________________

This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations.
Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized.
If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.

Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent.
Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite.
Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.