LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2006, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:30:54 -0800
Reply-To:     David L Cassell <davidlcassell@MSN.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         David L Cassell <davidlcassell@MSN.COM>
Subject:      Re: Specifying a residual correlation matrix
In-Reply-To:  <200603221913.k2MFuUkP004788@mailgw.cc.uga.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

ulf.emanuelson@KV.SLU.SE wrote: >I wonder if it is possible to specify a tailor-made residual correlation >matrix (R) to be used in a mixed model analysis (PROC MIXED or PROC >GLIMMIX)? > >The reason for the question is that we have observations on a number of >individuals (one obs per individual) and we are interested in estimating >the effects of some (fixed) explanatory variables on the outcome. However, >we know that these individuals are relatives and would like to account for >this similarity. The idea was then to force SAS to use an R-matrix that we >have defined and that show the relationship between them, since we believe >that e is not ND(0,I*sigma_e), but rather ND(0,R*sigma_e). I believe this >is pretty straight forward MME, but I am not sure that SAS can handle it.

I see that you have already received some expert advice. Follow it.

And also, have you considered that you have a more natural PROC MIXED problem if you think of the family as the subject at the first level and the person as the subject at the second level? That would allow you to use standard PROC MIXED covariance structures with SUBJECT=FAMILY and the individual people nested within family.

Finally, it's time once again for one of my pet peeves, upon which I am irrationally intent. :-) Are these data from a sample survey, or are they from an observational study? If they come from a sample survey, then you're using the wrong proc and you should be focusing on a multi-stage sample and PROC SURVEYREG. That would address the covariance structure without your having to define it first.

HTH, David -- David L. Cassell mathematical statistician Design Pathways 3115 NW Norwood Pl. Corvallis OR 97330

_________________________________________________________________ On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page