LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2006)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:15:03 -0400
Reply-To:     Richard Ristow <wrristow@mindspring.com>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Richard Ristow <wrristow@mindspring.com>
Subject:      Re: R in Linear Regression
Comments: To: "Marc Halbrügge" <marc.halbruegge@GMX.DE>
In-Reply-To:  <307.1146263046@www083.gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed;
              x-avg-checked=avg-ok-5816356E

At 06:24 PM 4/28/2006, Marc Halbrügge wrote:

>>Also, note that R (usually noted by an >>uppercase r) is the correlation coefficient, >>has a range of possible values from -1 to +1 >>(indicating from > perfect inverse correlation >>to perfect direct correlation). > >In linear regression, the correlation between >observed and predicted values cannot become >negative. This follows from minimizing the >squared differences between observed and predicted values.

You're right; it can't. But the correlation between observed, or predicted, values with predictOR variables (IVs) can very readily be negative; and that's what's being discussed.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page