LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2006)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:48:50 +0800
Reply-To:     j.forbes@ecu.edu.au
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         John Forbes <j.forbes@ecu.edu.au>
Organization: Edith Cowan University
Subject:      Multinomial Logistic Regression
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi everyone,

I've received some output that I don't quite understand when I run a MLR in SPSS 14.0.1.

The model-fitting information yields a chi-square of 301.67, with a sig. of .000 - which I believe indicates that the final model does a better job of describing the data than one using the intercept only. Nagelkerke's pseudo R-Square is .704. Finally, the classification table indicates that I'm correct 96.9%, 46.2%, and 68.6% of the time in terms of classifying participants into my three groups.

All of the above seems to indicate that the model is going quite well.

However, the Goodness of Fit table indicates a significant Pearson chi-square (p=.000), while the Deviance value is 1.000. I believe that a significant result indicates a poor model fit - so I'm receiving conflicting information from this table. Having .000 'and' 1.000 doesn't seem right to me, but everything else appears to indicate that the model isn't too shabby.

Is anyone able to explain this conflict, and perhaps suggest how I might be able to resolve it?

Many thanks .................. John


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page