LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2006)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:20:01 -0400
Reply-To:     Richard Ristow <wrristow@mindspring.com>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Richard Ristow <wrristow@mindspring.com>
Subject:      Re: correlation between covariates and DV
In-Reply-To:  <6250203B042D8349A920AA610383093601287B1B@UTHEVS3.mail.utho
              uston.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed;
              x-avg-checked=avg-ok-5816356E

At 06:50 PM 4/26/2006, Swank, Paul R wrote:

>I would say, if the mean square error is smaller with the covariate in >the model then leave it in.

Am I missing something? I believe the mean square error will be smaller if you add ANY variable to a linear model, whether the variable actually had anything to do with the DV or not. The simple way to see this is, the fitting minimizes the mean square error. When you add a variable, the old model is still available: it could be fit with a 0 coefficient on the new variable. So, mean-square error can't INCREASE. It will decrease unless, let's see, I think, unless the new variable is uncorrelated with the residuals from the model without the new variable.

That's why t-tests and F-tests: to test whether the reduction in mean square error is larger than expected by chance.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page