LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2006, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 8 May 2006 21:07:42 EDT
Reply-To:     Erik013@AOL.COM
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Erik013@AOL.COM
Subject:      Re: SAS Consulting - W2 vs CORP to CORP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Just to add what others have said, it looks like the W2 is the way to go (if I had to make the decision).

One of the things that if you are not incorporated and you get paid via 1099 (e.g. no taxes are taken out of your pay) is that the dreaded "self-employment" tax that you have to pay. This includes the part of the federal taxes that your employer pays when they pay you on a W2 basis. It sounds like $5 would hardly cover that if that is the spread that you are having to choose from. As others have said, if you are not a corp, then there probably is not enough time to set up a corp-to-corp if you have an offer in hand.

Typically, the "spread" between W2 and 1099 (or corp to corp) should cover your self-employment taxes, travel, lodging, healthcare, vacation/sick days, marketing, etc. These items need to be considered if going this route.

Good luck with making your decision.

Erik

Erik S. Larsen Independent Consultant P.O. Box 505 Charleston, SC 29401-0505

A SAS Certified Professional V8 A SAS Alliance Consulting Partner, Affiliate Member Larsen770@aol.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page