LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2006, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 26 May 2006 09:51:49 -0500
Reply-To:     Bryan <bryan.groups@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Bryan <bryan.groups@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Statistical question
Comments: To: davidlcassell@MSN.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

Baogong,

David's right on target. If you want more info there's more here on the UCLA stat's page:

http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/webbooks/reg/chapter2/sasreg2.htm

You might look especially at the example in section 2.3.

Now if you're supervisor is totally sold on the idea of transforming and smearing that's a different matter : )

Bryan

>From: David L Cassell <davidlcassell@MSN.COM> >Reply-To: David L Cassell <davidlcassell@MSN.COM> >To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU >Subject: Re: Statistical question >Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 22:42:40 -0700 > >bgjiang@GMAIL.COM wrote: >>I got a question from my supervisor, But I do not know how to answer. >>here is the question: >> >> "Say you log transform a dependent variable that is not normal and then >>perform regression. Maybe the dependent variable is $. Then to interpret >>the results, you have to retransform the log back to $. Articles talk >>abou= >>t >>using a smearing factor. What is a smearing factor and how is it >>determined?" >> >>anyone can help me with the answer or point me to some reference. >> > >I see Robin has already given you a good answer. > >So let me just kvetch a bit. > >The distribution of Y has nothing to do with the problem. Y may be >horribly distributed: a long tail, or huge outlying points, or anything. >And it may be *fine* for the regression model. Because the values >of your regressors may be making Y look like that. > >What matters is the distribution of the *residuals*. Not the distribution >of Y. If the residuals are non-normal, then you need to fix things. >But if you decide to fix things by transforming Y, or some of the X's, >or both, then you should be using PROC TRANSREG and letting it >do all the dirty work for you. > >HTH, >David >-- >David L. Cassell >mathematical statistician >Design Pathways >3115 NW Norwood Pl. >Corvallis OR 97330 > >_________________________________________________________________ >Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! >http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

_________________________________________________________________ Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page