LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2006)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:36:45 -0400
Reply-To:     Statisticsdoc <>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Statisticsdoc <>
Subject:      Re: Logistic regression help
Comments: To: Lou <charl_bean@YAHOO.CO.UK>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Keith Starborn

Dear Lou,

Categorizing continuous variables into categorical variables can result is a considerable loss of statistical power because the test for the categorized version of the variable uses more degrees of freedom that the test for the continuous variable. In addition, categorizing a continuous variable can result in a loss of predictive information.



---- Lou <charl_bean@YAHOO.CO.UK> wrote: > Dear list > > I am trying to carry out a logistic regression analysis and have a quick > question with regards to the best way to input my independent variables. > I have three input variables: ethnicity (5 groups), age and deprivation > score. Although age and deprivation score are continuous variables, I > have also been asked to split them into groups (4 for age and 5 for > deprivation) which are pre-determined by previous work on this subject > matter. The dependent variable is simply whether or not a person took a > particular test. > > I have tried generating models both with the age and deprivation variables > as they are and also with the new categorical age and deprivation > variables. However, when looking at interaction terms, I find that the > interaction between age and deprivation is significant when they are input > as the continuous variables but not significant when I used the > categorical versions. Why would this happen? Furthermore, which is the > best way to go? I have read information on logistic regression until my > head hurts, but still don’t feel completely satisfied as to how I should > determine the best model possible. > > Any advice would be appreciated please! > > Thanks > > Lou

-- For personalized and experienced consulting in statistics and research design, visit

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page