LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2006)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 25 Jun 2006 12:02:17 -0400
Reply-To:     Martin Sherman <MSherman@loyola.edu>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Martin Sherman <MSherman@loyola.edu>
Subject:      Follow up to stat question
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Dear list: A continuation of the evacuation question. I went ahead and looked at the time for evacuation (started to evacuate to exited onto the street). The correlations between floor started and time was .75 for one building and .77 for the other building. Next I did a regression analysis allowing for linear and quadratic. In both instances the linear and quadratic functions were significant. Next I allowed for a cubic function and this is what happened. For building 1 Linear was significant, quadratic and cubic were not significant. For building 2 linear was not significant, but quadratic and cubic were significant. My question is how would I lose significance for the quadratic when the cubic was allowed to enter for building 1. Also why would I lose significance for linear (given the very large zero-order correlation-my expectation was that the linear would stay in) for building 2 while picking up the cubic (besides the quadratic). Befuddled. TIA. P.S. A colleague recommended a Loess fitting curve. Does anyone have any thoughts about using the Loess?

martin sherman


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page