LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2006)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
=========================================================================
Date:         Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:11:35 -0400
Reply-To:     Gene Maguin <emaguin@buffalo.edu>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Gene Maguin <emaguin@buffalo.edu>
Subject:      Longitudinal ogistic regression
In-Reply-To:  <1d3820970607171035u43a42e38r1197411cbdb5de61@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

All,

I am analyzing some longitudinal data with dichotomous or ordinal variables. I had thought to say

LOGISTIC REGRESSION T2 WITH G T1/ENTER G T1/ENTER G BY T1.

Or, for ordinal variables.

PLUM T2 BY G WITH T1/LOCATION INTERCEPT G T1 G BY T1/PRINT FIT PARAMETER TPARALLEL.

However, somebody here has commented that such analyses are incorrect but, off the top of his head, couldn't recall the cite. Can anyone comment and, if possible, give a cite. If this setup is incorrect, what are the alternatives?


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page