LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2006)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:19:11 +0200
Reply-To:     Andreas Schneider <Andreas.H.Schneider@ifes.uni-erlangen.de>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Andreas Schneider <Andreas.H.Schneider@ifes.uni-erlangen.de>
Organization: Institut für empirische Soziologie a
              n der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nü
              rnberg
Subject:      Weighting and Nonparametric Tests
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Dear listers,

we have a dataset of about 4.500 respondents and weighted it by a weighting variable which is standardized by the number of cases, so that the number of cases in the weighted and the unweighted dataset is the same.

Calculating nonparametric tests like Kruskal-Wallis, however, provides a "wrong" (too large) number of cases for the weighted data.

Does this mean nonparametric tests can or should not be used with weighted datasets?

Thanks in advance

Andreas

-- Andreas H. Schneider Dipl.-Sozialwirt

Institut für empirische Soziologie an der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

Marienstr. 2 90402 Nürnberg

Tel.: 0911 23565 -41 Fax: 0911 23565 -50


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page