LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2006)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:28:47 -0500
Reply-To:     Gary Rosin <grosin@stcl.edu>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Gary Rosin <grosin@stcl.edu>
Subject:      Re: Loss function for log-likelihood nonlinear regression of
              proportion via Inverse Logit
In-Reply-To:  <006a01c6c0d9$f1ed6120$a200a8c0@NOTEBOOK>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 09:16 PM 8/15/2006, Hector Maletta wrote: >If you predict the binary exam outcome (pass or fail) via logistic >regression, you are predicting the logit (i.e. the natural logarithm of >[p/(1-p)]) as a linear function of the predictors. The log likelihood is >produced as a matter of course. But for doing so you would need >individual, not aggregated data ... . ***

Thanks, but I want to do nonlinear regression using the model Pass Rate (PR) = exp(b0 + b1*x1+ ... + bn*xn)/(1+exp(b0 + b1*x1+ ... + bn*xn)) What I need is the formula for the log-likelihood loss function, so that I can use that instead of least-squares.

Gary


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page