LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2006)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:20:30 -0500
Reply-To:     Gary Rosin <grosin@stcl.edu>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Gary Rosin <grosin@stcl.edu>
Subject:      Re: Loss function for log-likelihood nonlinear regression of
              proportion via Inverse Logit
In-Reply-To:  <002901c6c126$b1ffd7d0$a200a8c0@NOTEBOOK>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 06:25 AM 8/16/2006, Hector Maletta wrote: > The expression for non linear expression for the pass rate mentioned in >your message is exactly the definition of the probability of passing the >exam in logistic regression. Calling Z to the combination >b1X1+b2X2+...+bnXn, that probability is exp(z) / 1 + exp(Z), and the b >coefficients are the log odds ratios coefficients computed by logistic >regression.

Yes. In Nonlinear Regression that expression is what I use as the 'Model". The default loss function in least-squares. I'd like to use log-likelihood instead, but don't know the expression for that loss function.

Gary

---

Prof. Gary S. Rosin Internet: grosin@stcl.edu South Texas College of Law 1303 San Jacinto Voice: (713) 646-1854 Houston, TX 77002-7000 Fax: (713) 646-1766


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page