LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2006, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:58:58 -0400
Reply-To:     Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Subject:      Re: How can I do this type of analysis
Comments: To: sasncsu@GMAIL.COM

Xu,

I'm surprised that no one has responded yet. While I'm sure that not everyone would agree, I don't think that you can use statistics to do what you want.

There are numerous tests to discover whether differences might likely be due only to chance, but none (that I am aware of) to test equivalence (i.e., no difference).

Art --------- On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:13:21 -0400, Xu Yuan <sasncsu@GMAIL.COM> wrote:

>hello friends, > >I am a rookie in statistics, so please don't laught at me if my question is >silly. > >I have two columns of data (X and Y), which come from the same group of >experiment units but using two different methods. My objective is to see if >the two methods are (statistically) equivalent. The ideal situation is Y=X, >but this world is never ideal. I tried to fit linear regression in MS Excel >and the default model is Y=a*X+b with a R2. My question is what technique >should I use to achieve my goal (compare the two methods). Should I force >the intercept to zero? Or should I specify the slope to 1? (if so, please >tell me how). Please advise me. I can work in either MS Excel or SAS or R. I >am considering using paired t-test, but I am not if this is the right >procedure. > >Thanks a lot. > >Xu


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page