LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2007, week 5)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:15:52 -0500
Reply-To:     Ed Heaton <EdHeaton@WESTAT.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Ed Heaton <EdHeaton@WESTAT.COM>
Subject:      Re: Pre compiled macros vs MAUTOSOURCE
Comments: To: Raj <ramesh.chakri@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <1170103659.471908.200330@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Raj,

I'm working with some quite intensive macros, and the code using compiled macros runs quicker.

Reading macro code from text file...

NOTE: The SAS System used: real time 18.69 seconds cpu time 6.51 seconds

Running with compiled macros...

NOTE: The SAS System used: real time 14.66 seconds cpu time 5.43 seconds

Ed

Edward Heaton, Senior Systems Analyst, Westat (An Employee-Owned Research Corporation), 1600 Research Boulevard, RW-4541, Rockville, MD 20850-3195 Voice: (301) 610-4818 Fax: (301) 294-3879 mailto:EdHeaton@Westat.com http://www.Westat.com

-----Original Message----- From: owner-sas-l@listserv.uga.edu [mailto:owner-sas-l@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of Raj Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 3:48 PM To: sas-l@uga.edu Subject: Pre compiled macros vs MAUTOSOURCE

Hi Is there a significant improvement in the performance when using macros as pre-compiled vs having them referenced by SASAUTOS= option.

Any expert comments? thanks Raj


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page