LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2007, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:52:08 -0500
Reply-To:   Sigurd Hermansen <HERMANS1@WESTAT.COM>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Sigurd Hermansen <HERMANS1@WESTAT.COM>
Subject:   Re: Check it out--we're java programmers
Comments:   To: "Pardee, Roy" <pardee.r@ghc.org>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Interesting idea ... I wish that the developers would avoid playing on old misconceptions about compiled vs. interpreted programs: " ... runtime speed (compiled Java runs at a significant multiple of the speed of interpreted Base SASŪ)..." I can't imagine that either compilation or interpretation of SAS programs would save substantial amounts of time in any application. No harm in illustrating a few examples of how compiling Java programs leads to faster execution times, but global claims based on flimsy technical support convince no one but the gullible. S ________________________________

From: owner-sas-l@listserv.uga.edu on behalf of Pardee, Roy Sent: Sat 2/10/2007 12:08 PM To: SAS(r) Discussion Subject: Check it out--we're java programmers

Happened across this this morning--a base sas -> java compiler:

http://www.dullesopen.com/

I want a raise now. ;-)


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page