LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2007)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:22:24 -0500
Reply-To:     Dan Zetu <dzetu@hotmail.com>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Dan Zetu <dzetu@hotmail.com>
Subject:      Re: RECODE question
Comments: To: tricia-seifert@uiowa.edu
In-Reply-To:  <20070313103705.1g6jto56sgg8k4og@webmail.uiowa.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

You could create a dummy called "Missing", which is 1 if income is missing and 0 otherwise. This way, you wouldn't lose any cases, although I don't know what value that may add to your model (unless there is a pattern for missing Income and losing these cases may affect other variables).

Dan

>From: Tricia Seifert <tricia-seifert@uiowa.edu> >Reply-To: Tricia Seifert <tricia-seifert@uiowa.edu> >To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU >Subject: RECODE question >Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:37:05 -0500 > >Hello, >I was wondering if someone would be able to help me through a recode >question. I have a question that asks respondents to report their >parents income. The response categories are the following: >1 = Less than $14,999, 4.2% >2 = $15,000 - $24,999, 4.0% >3 = $25,000 - $34,999, 6.0% >4 = $35,000 - $49,999, 8.5% >5 = $50,000 - $74,999, 17.3% >6 = $75,000 - $99,999, 15.2% >7 = $100,000 - $199,999, 22.6% >8 = $200,000 - $299,999, 5.5% >9 = $300,000 or more, 5.1% >0 = Not applicable, 9.5% >MISSING = 2.0% > >The overall goal is to be able to run a regression in which I don't >lose any cases. Does anyone have any suggestions to do this? I >greatly appreciate any thoughts or suggestions. I've thought about >recoding into several dummy variables but I can't seem to eliminate >the missing data from the parents income variable, which is the >variable with the most variability. > >I was also wondering if anyone knows of any standard in how to recode >the largest response category in which no upper limit is specified. >For example, response option 9 is for those whose parents earn >$300,000 or more. Any suggestions as to how I should set this to a >midpoint? > >Again, thanks for any help that you provide in this matter. >Best, >Tricia Seifert >Postdoctoral Research Scholar >Center for Research on Undergraduate Education >University of Iowa >N438 Lindquist Center (physical address) >N491 Lindquist Center (mailing address) >Iowa City, IA 52242 >319-335-5377

_________________________________________________________________ Play Flexicon: the crossword game that feeds your brain. PLAY now for FREE. http://zone.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm?icid=flexicon_hmtagline


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page