Date:         Mon, 14 May 2007 13:21:51 -0400
Reply-To:     "data _null_;" <datanull@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "data _null_;" <datanull@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: macro question.....maybe SYMPUT
Comments: To: iw1junk@comcast.net
In-Reply-To:  <051420071617.7311.46488BB1000AD4E500001C8F220075074405029A06CE9907@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 5/14/07, Ian Whitlock <iw1junk@comcast.net> wrote:
> check.  Note: SEQ was added for the first solution, somewhat, suggested by
> data _null_.

I'm not sure what you think I was somewhat suggesting.

I was not offering any code.  I had pasted Peters PROC PRINT step to
refer to when asking for more information.

I was suggesting that MACRO was not need or perhaps not desired as
your program has demonstrated.  I was still working on a solution but
did not post because it would be superfluous at this late stage.