LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2007)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:50:38 -0400
Reply-To:   Art@DrKendall.org
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Art Kendall <Arthur.Kendall@verizon.net>
Subject:   Re: recoding
In-Reply-To:   <5095EA94F7D54D47BB3E500CD4D8B06903112A@modmsx012.network.local>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Something like this untested syntax may be what you need.

If you have one or more string variables, you could AUTORECODE them into a new set of variables

AUTORECODE VARIABLES= answer1 to answer7 /INTO x1 to x7 /GROUP /PRINT.

Then you could collapse some codes into a correctly spelled code. recode x1 to x7 (1,3,4,11=4) (73, 74, 75 =74) (200 thru 205= 202)(else=copy) into y1 to y7.

Autorecode variables= y1 to y7 /into z1 to z7 /group /print.

Art Kendall Social Research Consultants

Noble, Lyndsay wrote: > You know, I can't think of a more efficient way than recoding, but 600 > recodes seems daunting. Maybe someone else on the list serve has an idea? > > Lyndsay > > > -----Original Message----- > From: saygili ayca [mailto:aycasaygili@yahoo.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:48 AM > To: Noble, Lyndsay > Subject: RE: recoding > > I appreciate if you know an efficient way: > > There is a variable that contains drug name. But in > CRF it is open ended question. There are a lot of > miscoding error. We are trying to clean data by > recoding. :)) > > --- "Noble, Lyndsay" <Lyndsay.Noble@ejgallo.com> > wrote: > > >> There might be a more efficient way of doing it than >> writing all of the >> recode statements. What is the nature of the >> situation? >> >> Lyndsay >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: saygili ayca [mailto:aycasaygili@yahoo.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 1:20 AM >> To: Noble, Lyndsay >> Subject: RE: recoding >> >> thanx. we need around 600, that is why I asked. --- >> "Noble, Lyndsay" <Lyndsay.Noble@ejgallo.com> wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> I've done up to around 70 and not had a problem. >>> >>> Lyndsay >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: SPSSX(r) Discussion >>> [mailto:SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of >>> saygili ayca >>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 3:45 AM >>> To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU >>> Subject: recoding >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> when we recode a variable into new variable, Is >>> there >>> any limitation on number of coding? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > _____________________________________________________________________________ > >>> _______ >>> Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! >>> >> Small >> >>> Business gives you all >>> the tools to get online. >>> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > _____________________________________________________________________________ > >> _______ >> Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers >> from someone who knows. >> Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. >> >> > http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469 > > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________________ > _______ > Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for > today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. > http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page