LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2007)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:13:35 -0300
Reply-To:     Hector Maletta <hmaletta@fibertel.com.ar>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Hector Maletta <hmaletta@fibertel.com.ar>
Subject:      Re: stepwise regression how to include all cases despite missing
              data
Comments: To: Hunna Watson <H.Watson@curtin.edu.au>
In-Reply-To:  <025B627619018245B4278307238F0839089DE8BC@exmsp2.perth.ad.curtin.edu.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hunna, Your use of the stepwise method for regression instead of running with all the variables at once is immaterial for your problem. What you need is some way of dealing with projects where some organizational practice does not apply. You do not give many details about the variables, but I imagine that each organizational practice might be a dummy variable, either present or absent. In such case, you may posit its effect on costs not as a result of "choosing or not choosing it when it is adequate to choose it" but as a result of its mere presence. A project may benefit from a practice if (a) the practice is applicable and (b) it is actually used; otherwise the project does not benefit from that practice. The absence of a practice may thus be a result of deliberate choice or impossibility of application, but in either case it would result in its effect not being observed. In other words, you may (if your particular situation affords this interpretation) treat the "missing" cases as negative instances, as zeroes in the dummies, and proceed with the regression. If this road is not conceptually adequate, you're in trouble. Hector

-----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Hunna Watson Sent: 25 July 2007 10:59 To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: stepwise regression how to include all cases despite missing data

Hi all,

I'm running a stepwise regression of organizational practices on construction projects that predict project cost growth. I have data for 115 projects, yet some organizational practices were not applicable on some projects (in a random fashion). the missing data is obviously purposeful and not due to not filling in questionnaires etc. spss automatically excludes cases with any missing values, or wants to substitute a value, so I end up with a regression being carried out on 10 projects, obviously not useful. Any suggestions for syntax to include all cases or suggestions to rectify this problem?

Thanks in advance, Hunna Watson


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page