LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2007)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 6 Sep 2007 10:50:29 -0600
Reply-To:     ViAnn Beadle <vab88011@gmail.com>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         ViAnn Beadle <vab88011@gmail.com>
Subject:      Re: Multi-response variables
Comments: To: Silviu Matei <silviu.matei@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <200709060646.l85NnQ2W014460@mailgw.cc.uga.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I seem to have missed the original post but there are two kinds of multiple response variables. This user's variables appear to be multiple dichotomies which work in MULT RESPONSE, TABLES, and CTABLES.

-----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Silviu Matei Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 12:46 AM To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: Multi-response variables

Hi Jan,

I think that you may not be able to do that unless to recode your variables. For instance, if you have 3 variables var1, var2 and var3. And currently, they all have value 1 when checked, you will have to recode var2 (1=2) and var3 (1=3). The you can apply the method for multiple analysis response. The problem is that - in the current state of facts - as all your variables have the same code (1) - the multiple response procedure can not distinguish between different answers. This is why the variables included in the procedure should have different codes. Hope that works. Silviu


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page