LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2007, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 7 Sep 2007 17:17:45 -0400
Reply-To:     Kevin Roland Viel <kviel@EMORY.EDU>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Kevin Roland Viel <kviel@EMORY.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Friday Afternoon Musing
In-Reply-To:  <200709072035.l87H9JdG019327@mailgw.cc.uga.edu>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Chang Chung wrote:

> so technically it is incorrect to say that the libname statements executes. > It is, however, correct to say that the libname statements take immediate > effects once being compiled.

This is the point at which the computer scientist respond, highlighting that I am a SAS user and not programmer :)

The cited statements (RUN, ENDSAS) are instructions. Does SAS still not need to compile (intrepret) them? What distinguishes performed instructions from execution?

> it says, "(ENDSAS Statement) terminates a SAS job or session after the > current DATA or PROC step executes"

How? The instructions must be translated, sent to the CPU, and performed? Is this not "execution"?

Perhaps, the OP meant that when RUN is compiled, no further compilation occurs, and the compiled statements to that point are executed? I am interested to hear some answers, but Knuth's machine is haunting me at the moment.

Kevin

Kevin Viel, PhD Post-doctoral fellow Department of Genetics Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research San Antonio, TX 78227


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page