LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2007)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:48:44 +0530
Reply-To:     Euclid Associates <euclidassociates@gmail.com>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Euclid Associates <euclidassociates@gmail.com>
Subject:      reliability question
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Dear All, I will be grateful if you all kindly help me to understand about the convention.

I have 28 item scale and construct is multidimensional.(I have done factor analysis). My global reliabiliy is around 0.74. However, when I calculate factor wise reliability, I find reliability comes down to 0.62, 0.72, 0.54 like this.

I understand Nunnally's cut off criteria is for global. Does it apply to factor wise reliability too. To what extent I should consider for confirmatory analysis - otherwise measurement error will interrupt the confirmatory analysis.

Please help. Thank you for your time. With regards Euclid

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page