Date:         Wed, 28 May 2008 08:11:45 EDT
Reply-To:     CICS List <CICS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
Sender:       CICS List <CICS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Gene Hudders <Eshudders@AOL.COM>
Subject:      Re: performance issue
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

Hi:
 
Check to see the L8 TCB priorities assigned to the Pool and DB2ENTRY  because 
they could be set to high which may affect the QR access to the  CPU.  A long 
time ago, Natural ran on the QR TCB.  Don't know if it  has changed to use 
the L8.
 
Regards,
Gene
 
 
In a message dated 5/28/2008 4:15:59 A.M. SA Western Standard Time,  
benlam18@HOTMAIL.COM writes:

We have  implemented a new application system, a DB2/Natural system that runs 
in its  own CICS in our PROD LPAR. We have severe response time problems, and 
we use  TMON to monitor CICS. One of the major waits is WAIT ON REDISPATCH, 
that  indicates CPU shortage. However, according to our RMF reports the CPU  
usage is about 75%, and we wonder why CICS is not getting the  CPU.

Any ideas will be appreciated.


 
____________________________________
Give to a good cause with every e-mail. _Join the i知 Initiative from 
Microsoft._ (http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Join/Default.aspx?souce=EML_WL_ 
GoodCause)   =




**************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with 
Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.      
(http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4&?NCID=aolfod00030000000002)

[text/html]