LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2008)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Fri, 2 May 2008 13:16:38 -0400
Reply-To:   Ingo Frommann <ingo.frommann@UKB.UNI-BONN.DE>
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Ingo Frommann <ingo.frommann@UKB.UNI-BONN.DE>
Subject:   Re: MANCOVA with mixed-model repeated measure

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:04:13 -0400, Ingo.Frommann@ukb.uni-bonn.de <ingo.frommann@UKB.UNI-BONN.DE> wrote:

>Dear All, > >I have a question about the use of ANCOVA. In a repeated measure >design with three levels, (neuropsychlogical domains: memory, >executive, attention) on the within subject factor and three levels on >the between subject factor (Controls, Group2, Group3), i want to >correct for psychopathological symptoms which were present only in >Group2 and Group3, but not in the control group. > >Thus, I added for all controls zero on the symptom varibale and tried >to use the following syntax. > >GLM > np_memo np_exec np_atten BY group WITH symptoms > /WSFACTOR = domain 3 Polynomial > /METHOD = SSTYPE(3) > /EMMEANS = TABLES(group) WITH(symptoms=MEAN) COMPARE ADJ(BONFERRONI) > /EMMEANS = TABLES(group*domain) WITH(symptoms=MEAN) >COMPARE(eproject) ADJ(BONFERRONI) > /PRINT = DESCRIPTIVE ETASQ PARAMETER HOMOGENEITY GEF > /CRITERIA = ALPHA(.05) > /WSDESIGN = domain > /DESIGN = eproject*cor_pans_pos eproject. > >I have the following questions: >1. Did produce this syntax covariates which were estimated separate >for each group and each neuropsychological domain? >2. Were main effects and interactions in the output based on adjusted >means corrected for theinfluence of the covariate? >3. Is it possible with the EMMEANS subcommand to compare the adjusted >means of the groups. Only group2 were compared against group3 in my >outputs? Is it possible to use a more hirarchical procedure, where >first the effects of the covariates were eleminated and then the >groups were compared against each other? How can I do this with >SPSS? >4. Is it possible to save the adjusted values for each case in the >data sheet? > >Thank you very much for your reply, >best regards > >Ingo > >===================== >To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to >LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the >command. To leave the list, send the command >SIGNOFF SPSSX-L >For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command >INFO REFCARD

Dear all,

Sorry, the submitted command syntax needs some correction:

GLM np_memo np_exec np_atten BY group WITH symptoms /WSFACTOR = domain 3 Polynomial /METHOD = SSTYPE(3) /EMMEANS = TABLES(group) WITH(symptoms=MEAN) COMPARE ADJ(BONFERRONI) /EMMEANS = TABLES(group*domain)WITH(symptoms=MEAN)COMPARE(group) ADJ(BONFERRONI) /PRINT = DESCRIPTIVE ETASQ PARAMETER HOMOGENEITY GEF /CRITERIA = ALPHA(.05) /WSDESIGN = domain /DESIGN = group*symptoms group.

I did not find a simple solution for my problem in SPSS, so I calculated simple linear regression analysis for all dependent variables with variable "symptoms" as predictor within each clinical group (group1 and group2). I get a linear equitation for each dependent variable and each group: Y = B*X + c + e, where Y is the dependent variable, x the symptoms, B the estimated coefficient,c the constant, and e the residual. Then I adjusted all dependent variables by subtracting the estimated effect from the empirical data by calculating: Ya = Y - B*X , where Ya is the adjusted domain score. For the control group I copy the original data. Finally with the adjusted variables I conduct a simple MANOVA:

np_memo_a np_exec_a np_atten_a BY group /WSFACTOR = domain 3 Polynomial /METHOD = SSTYPE(3) /EMMEANS = TABLES(group) COMPARE ADJ(BONFERRONI) /EMMEANS = TABLES(group*domain)COMPARE(group) ADJ(BONFERRONI) /PRINT = DESCRIPTIVE ETASQ PARAMETER HOMOGENEITY GEF /CRITERIA = ALPHA(.05) /WSDESIGN = domain /DESIGN = group.

I do not know, whether this procedure was correct? Any advice appreciated!

Thanks, Ingo

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page