LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2008)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:33:12 -0700
Reply-To:     David Futrell <dfutrell62@yahoo.com>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         David Futrell <dfutrell62@yahoo.com>
Subject:      Re: Handling Don't Know Responses in Scale Construction
In-Reply-To:  <200806040906.m53JIDPa011259@malibu.cc.uga.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Hannah, They should be treated as "missing" data. The respondents had the option of choosing the mid-point (i.e., neutral) point on the scale, but chose "don't know" instead. Usually, this means they didn't have enough information to answer the question.

This probably means something qualitatively different from "neutral" which might imply something like ambivalence (i.e., being torn between the ends of the scale) or apathy (not caring).

David Futrell, Ph.D. Senior Workforce Research Consultant Eli Lilly and Company

Hannah State-Davey <hmclarke@HOTMAIL.CO.UK> wrote: I am currently developing an attitude scale and have collected data for initial item reduction. The scale uses a 7-point likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=slightly disagree, 4=neutral, 5=slightly agree, 6=agree, 7=strongly agree). I also included a 'Dont Know' category to filter out any items that respondents consistently could not answer. My problem is how to handle these 'Don't Know' responses correctly. It clearly provides an 'attitude' and so is important information that should be included in analysis. There are a number of options that I have come up with:

1) to treat DK responses as missing values and replace with mean, EM or such like. I feel this option distorts the data somewhat. 2) to collapse DK responses into the mid-point (i.e. neutral) - despite neutral and DK having different meanings. This is an option that I have seen several researchers use. 3) to treat DK responses as a valid response in the scale. The problem here is that they are of a different charachter to the 1-7 scale. This presumably creates problems when you come to factor analysis??

If anyone can provide any advice on this i would be really grateful?

Many thanks

Hannah

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page