LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2008, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:06:23 -0400
Reply-To:     Hari Nath <hari_s_nath@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Hari Nath <hari_s_nath@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: Oracle to SAS to DB2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Thanks Howard and Gerhard for your suggestions....Will give a try...

On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 05:43:55 -0400, Gerhard Hellriegel <gerhard.hellriegel@T-ONLINE.DE> wrote:

>and note: physically that is the same. Both are datasets on a harddisk, >depending on the OS you use. Important for sure is the kind of that >harddisks: local ones are normally faster than remote ones, RAID systems >can (!) be faster than no-RAID, depending on the RAID-level, new harddisks >are some“times faster than old ones (not because they get slower, but >because new technology might be faster. Not always, e.g. the new >electronic disks are faster in reading, but slower in writing). > >To find out the best way: have a look at all storage which is available >and big enough, then try it out. > >By the way: it could be a good idea to take a local disk, but NOT that one >where SAS and all the other programs reside. Install a dedicated harddisk >for your data-files! > >All is different (and good!), if you are on a zOS-mainframe: try to use >hiperspace in that case! That might be really fast, depending on where the >hiperspace is realized and how many others are using it at the same time. > >Gerhard > > > >On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:26:31 -0400, Howard Schreier <hs AT dc-sug DOT org> ><schreier.junk.mail@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > >>On Sat, 31 May 2008 13:14:39 -0400, Hari Nath <hari_s_nath@YAHOO.COM> >wrote: >> >>>Hi all, >>> >>>Is there a difference in performance between loading a db2 table from a >>>temporary sas dataset versus a permanent sas dataset. >>> >>>I am running a process in Oracle wherein the output is stored in a sas >>>dataset and then this data is fed back into DB2. My question is whether >>>there will be an improvement in performance if the created sas dataset >was >>>stored in a permanent library other than work. Am using sas 8.2 >>> >>>Thanks for your reply in advance!! >>> >>>--hari >> >>I think it depends less on temporary vs. permanent and more on where the >two >>libraries live on the network. Try to create the intermediate data set on >>the box where SAS is running.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page