| Date: | Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:49:16 -0400 |
| Reply-To: | Don Henderson <donaldjhenderson@HOTMAIL.COM> |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
|
| From: | Don Henderson <donaldjhenderson@HOTMAIL.COM> |
| Subject: | Re: www.sascommunity.org |
|
| In-Reply-To: | <073020080002.18054.488FAF7A000B8E4800004686220588911605029A06CE9907@comcast.net> |
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Thanks for the suggestion Ian.
The concept of a "papers" section already exists on sasCommunity.org - a
category called Presentations. There is a link to Presentations along the
left hand side panel. It will bring you to:
http://www.sascommunity.org/wiki/Category:Presentations
To date there are not that many papers/presentations there. As we get more
contributions we can evolve the categories and subcategories to reflect the
content. We can also perhaps take advantage of some new features in the
underlying MediaWiki software to do a better job of organizing such
categories. Researching that is on the wishlist.
Regards,
donh
-----Original Message-----
From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Ian
Whitlock
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 8:02 PM
To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: www.sascommunity.org
Don, Lex,
I would suggest having a section Papers at www.sascommunity.org.
Anyone could post paper or link to paper with key words. Then Lex could add
search facility of entire www.sascommunity.org and a special one to the
Papers section.
If author wants to modify a proceeding paper, he would send it to the
community Papers site. Anyone who wanted to check a paper for updates and
fixes could then check to see if there is a later version at Papers.
The advantage of this recommendation is that the searching activity is still
located in one place convenient to the user. The paper author has the
responsibility to maintain the integrity of his contribution.
The user has the knowledge that this can more than a quick entry made at the
site. When the paper is in a PDF format, one cannot modify it, yet one can
add discussion about the paper.
Ian Whitlock
===============
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:33:04 -0400
Reply-To: Don Henderson <donaldjhenderson@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion"
Comments: RFC822 error: <W> MESSAGE-ID field duplicated. Last
occurrence
was retained.
From: Don Henderson <donaldjhenderson@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: www.sascommunity.org
Comments: To: Lex Jansen <lexjansen@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To: <78c3c04e-fe4e-4e91-8208-
c7de63f89c0d@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
One of the advantages of doing this on the sasCommunity.org site is that the
author will likely be watching the pages/files. So if someone else updates
them incorrectly, when they receive the email notification that the file or
page was changed they can check out the changes and roll them back if
needed. That is a built-in feature of the MediaWiki software that
sasCommunity.org (and Wikipedia) are built on top of.
The same applies to any change someone makes to an article or file.
The changes can be rolled back or corrected as needed.
Regards, donh
|