LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2008, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:13:38 -0700
Reply-To:     "sophe88@yahoo.com" <sophe88@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "sophe88@yahoo.com" <sophe88@YAHOO.COM>
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Subject:      which transformation
Comments: To: sas-l@uga.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

Binary 0/1 logistic regression. A continuous variable (unique values >30) has pretty good univariate correlation with the dependant variable, ~5%missing only. It has been selected from about ~1000 candidates.

Now somebody did log, sqrt, P99/p95 truncation and +several other fancy transformations (one is from WOE, which I don't like). Each one preserves original monoto. But how do we know one is better than another? What procedures to run to compare them? Thanks. Paula


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page