Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:14:58 GMT
Reply-To: Lou <lpogoda@VERIZON.NET>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: Lou <lpogoda@VERIZON.NET>
Subject: Re: Difference between Batch and Interactive runs
"FPAStatman" <email@example.com> wrote in message
> I have a program that I have run through interactive or window mode in
> SAS, and it runs just fine. I then run the exact same program with
> the exact same data through batch mode, and it freezes. Does anyone
> know why this would be?
Every time when I've seen this kind of situation, it's because the program
was written interactively using the "enhanced" editor, and the programmer
didn't pay attention.
The enhanced editor lets you write code with long lines - I don't know what
the limit is, or even if there is one.
However, when a program is run in batch, SAS has to make some assumptions
about the program file. One of these assumptions is the length of the lines
in order to set up an input buffer. If a line is longer than the buffer
allows, it gets truncated, and depending on what's going on at the point of
truncation, the thing can just sit there. For instance, if a comment is
opened with a /* and the comment closing */ gets truncated, as far as SAS is
concerned the rest of the file is all part of the comment and the process
just sits there. Just as it would in interactive mode if you submitted the
comment opening /* and never closed the comment.
I've seen many a programmer write stuff that will only run when submitted
from the enhanced editor, and the reason has always been that some program
line(s) exceeded the maximum length accepted by the batch process. Pretty
poor practice, in my opinion, both on the part of the programmer for writing
in such a run on fashion, and on the part of SAS for introducing yet another