LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2008, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:04:23 -0500
Reply-To:     Mary <mlhoward@avalon.net>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Mary <mlhoward@AVALON.NET>
Subject:      Re: sasware ballot 2009
Comments: To: Jim Loughlin-Loughlin Consulting
          <jloughlin@loughlinConsulting.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Wow! I didn't know that.

HOWEVER, it is the WORST debugger I have ever used!!!! It makes you know line numbers rather than allowing you to set it in the code, does not show you what line of the code it is at, makes you enter the names of the variables as opposed to being able to point at code and right-click and add them.

OK, so I'll revise my request- bring this into the 19th century--even mainframe debug products are better than this.

-Mary ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Loughlin-Loughlin Consulting To: Mary Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:26 PM Subject: Re: Re: sasware ballot 2009

The SAS data step does have a debug feature which allows you to do exactly what you are talking about.

Try

data one/debug; x=1; y=2; run;

----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary" <mlhoward@AVALON.NET> To: <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 8:51 AM Subject: Re: sasware ballot 2009

The other thing I noticed was that there were not any questions about making the SAS display manager more user friendly for SAS developers; such as the ability to walk through code in debug mode while watching variables and setting breakpoints, or even having fill-in functions. These are standard features of many developer platforms, such as PowerBuilder, Oracle's SQL Developer, and Excel's Visual Basic, yet SAS seems far behind the curve on these.

Who decided on the questions, anyway?

-Mary ----- Original Message ----- From: Alan Churchill To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:47 AM Subject: Re: sasware ballot 2009

Personally, I think there needs to be a more strategic aspect to the

ballot. These are a list of very tactical items whereas I want to vote on strategic issues. I did not see stuff such as web services support, Office 2007 support, ADO.NET support, write access from Int Tech local provider, elimination of the need for XML mapping, etc.

The list above is my vote (but I am in left field so I doubt my vote counts...).

Alan

Alan Churchill Savian www.savian.net

-----Original Message----- From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Andre Wielki Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 1:32 AM To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: sasware ballot 2009

http://support.sas.com/community/ballot/sasware_ballot09/ballot.html

-- André WIELKI INED (Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques) Service Informatique 133 Boulevard Davout 75980 Paris Cedex 20 mél : wielki@ined.fr tél : 33 (0) 1 56 06 21 54


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page