LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2009, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:46:10 -0700
Reply-To:   Jack Hamilton <jfh@STANFORDALUMNI.ORG>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Jack Hamilton <jfh@STANFORDALUMNI.ORG>
Subject:   Re: SAS Institute to invest upto $20 m with R Project
Comments:   To: Peter Flom <>
In-Reply-To:   <>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes

On Apr 1, 2009, at 10:55 am, Peter Flom wrote:

> Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET> wrote >> Alex, >> >> Even though this thread has already gone well into the Friday Humor >> zone, >> its still April Fool's Day in both Europe and North America, and I >> personally agree with the results of this year's SAS-L vote, I'm >> still >> going to use it to address your comment on SAS-L MVS voting. >> >> We get to nominate and elect anyone we so choose, without >> justification, >> but the operative term is 'we.' >> >> As you and I both heard at this year's SAS-L BOF, only around 30 of >> us >> bothered to vote in this year's SAS-L election in spite of the fact >> that >> it was open to anyone who cared to vote. >> >> I would hope that those who either read or post on the list, but >> haven't >> voted in the past, don't allow the commendation to become a travesty. >> >> Art > > > I think there are a couple of issues here. > > First, many of the most prolific and helpful SAS-Lers are already in > the hall of fame > and thus ineligible.

You can vote for me next year - I'm still eligible.

-- Jack Hamilton Videtis illam spirare libertatis auram

> I can appreciate that .... the same couple people winning year after > year would be dull..... But, given how MANY people are now in the H > of F, and still active here, > it might be good to make it 3 categories: > Masters, rookies, and .... well, some category for the rest of us. > > This might spark additional interest in the voting, too. > > Second, I read all or nearly all of the statistics posts, but > on other topics, I read relatively little There is certainly some > overlap between > the statistics posters and everyone else, but there are also quite a > few people > who mostly post about statistics. I imagine that many readers only > read certrain > topics. This makes it hard to vote and nominate > > Peter > > I am not qualified to say whose posts on other topics are good or bad. > > Peter L. Flom, PhD > Statistical Consultant > www DOT peterflomconsulting DOT com

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page