LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2009, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Sat, 4 Apr 2009 15:07:12 -0700
Reply-To:   Jack Hamilton <jfh@STANFORDALUMNI.ORG>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Jack Hamilton <jfh@STANFORDALUMNI.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Heteroscedasticity
Comments:   To: Michael Raithel <michaelraithel@WESTAT.COM>
In-Reply-To:   <037AB3FF38D44C4BAFB5DFF3D06B57BA020AE801@EX-CMS01.westat.com>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes

On Apr 4, 2009, at 2:51 pm, Michael Raithel wrote:

> Dear SAS-L-ers, > > Priyanka posted the following: > >> Dear all, >> >> I want to check for the presence of heteroscedasticity in the >> residuals of the regression that I ran. How to do it in SAS? >> > > Priyanka it looks like you got your answer from several talented SAS- > L-ers, and I certainly won't be of any help on this topic. > > I just wanted to confess that the word "Heteroscedasticity" is my > absolute favorite word on the 'L! I am not concerned about > heteroscedasticity at my job, I have a vague idea of what > heteroscedasticity means (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heteroskedasticity > ), I don't really think about heteroscedasticity in my off hours, I > never read articles concerned with heteroscedasticity, and I have > never used it in a spoken sentence--except to say it under my breath > in my office when reading an 'L posting. However, I have been > fascinated by that word since I first read it on the 'L and never > miss a posting concerning heteroscedasticity!

But you people never mention homoscedasticity! What kind of bigoted list is this, anyway!

-- Jack Hamilton jfh@alumni.stanford.org Videtis illam spirare libertatis auram

> > > All right; now you all know one (of my many) dark little SAS-L > obsessions. I wonder if there are others on this list who are > fascinated by words/topics that are either irrelevant to them... > > Priyanka, best of luck in all of your heteroscedasticity endeavors! > > > I hope that this suggestion proves helpful now, and in the future! > > Of course, all of these opinions and insights are my own, and do not > reflect those of my organization or my associates. All SAS code and/ > or methodologies specified in this posting are for illustrative > purposes only and no warranty is stated or implied as to their > accuracy or applicability. People deciding to use information in > this posting do so at their own risk. > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Michael A. Raithel > "The man who wrote the book on performance" > E-mail: MichaelRaithel@westat.com > > Author: Tuning SAS Applications in the MVS Environment > > Author: Tuning SAS Applications in the OS/390 and z/OS Environments, > Second Edition > http://www.sas.com/apps/pubscat/bookdetails.jsp?catid=1&pc=58172 > > Author: The Complete Guide to SAS Indexes > > http://www.sas.com/apps/pubscat/bookdetails.jsp?catid=1&pc=60409 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > There is no greater impediment to the advancement of knowledge > than the ambiguity of words. - Thomas Reid > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page