LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2009)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 31 May 2009 05:27:18 -0700
Reply-To:     Jims More <morejims@yahoo.com.au>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Jims More <morejims@yahoo.com.au>
Subject:      Re: inflated exp(b) in logistic regression
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

Hi delliott, Scott, etc,   I am interested of this issue.  I apologize for interferring.  What is the range of exp(b) to be acceptable?   Jims

--- On Sun, 31/5/09, SR Millis <srmillis@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: SR Millis <srmillis@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: inflated exp(b) in logistic regression To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Received: Sunday, 31 May, 2009, 4:13 AM

Have you checked the collinearity diagnostics?

Scott R Millis, PhD, ABPP (CN,CL,RP), CStat, CSci Professor & Director of Research Dept of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Dept of Emergency Medicine Wayne State University School of Medicine 261 Mack Blvd Detroit, MI 48201 Email:  smillis@med.wayne.edu Tel: 313-993-8085 Fax: 313-966-7682

--- On Sat, 5/30/09, delliott <dianecelliott@GMAIL.COM> wrote:

> From: delliott <dianecelliott@GMAIL.COM> > Subject: inflated exp(b) in logistic regression > To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Date: Saturday, May 30, 2009, 11:33 PM > Hi, > I'm running a logistic regression (n=870) with 8 IVs most > of which are > continuous. For one of my continuous IVs I'm getting an > inflated exp(b) of > 86.73 which seems wrong.  The B is 4.4, se = 2.2 and > wald = 3.9 which all > seem okay.  I did box-tidwell to check linearity of > logit assumption and am > not violating this assumption.  Any ideas why this is > going on? > > On a related note, my constant has a wald of 59.6- is that > okay?  seems high > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/inflated-exp%28b%29-in-logistic-regression-tp23799527p23799527.html > Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the > command > INFO REFCARD >

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD Need a Holiday? Win a $10,000 Holiday of your choice. Enter now.http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5rBHRtX2xuawNVMTEwMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQDWWFob28hBHRtX3BvcwN0YWdsaW5lBHRtX3BwdHkDYXVueg--/SIG=14600t3ni/**http%3A//au.rd.yahoo.com/mail/tagline/creativeholidays/*http%3A//au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/%3Fp1=other%26p2=au%26p3=mailtagline


[text/html]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page